The WTS in former times was probably more exposed than more recently. It used to make outrageous claims about special wheat, aluminum, vaccinations, etc. The lawyers running the corporation now are probably the ones keeping them out of court these days.
Nevertheless, somehow the average JW believes that blood is never needed by competent physicians, that blood is both bad and a dangerous medicine. Where did they get this idea? Find the source of that impression and you may have a case of “practicing medicine.”
In addition, the average JW has long held the notion that medicine in general is bad, and that physicians are scheming, money grubbing scoundrels. The WTS blood policy fits this theme; they have alluded in their literature to the money made by the “blood industry” as a large part of the reason doctors push transfusions on patients.
With this in mind I was disappointed to see Dung say the following in her post: “Quakery has been around for a long time, if indeed that's what this is. From what I can see, this woman lived just as long with alternative treatment as many women do with conventional treatment. So have many others. The people who really care the most about cases like this is mainstream medical practicioners, who don't want to lose a big chunk of income.”
She shows by this mind set that of the JW mentality still influences her thinking. “Lived just as long…” What an outrageous statement in the face of testimony from her physicians that she qualified for a mastectomy! Many women live far longer that this woman did when they have the recommended surgery. Granted, she may have refused surgery, but this case is to determine if the defendant helped persuade her to decline the doctors recommendation.
From personal experience I can say that Dung is correct with respect to a very small percent of the physician population. Just as in any population, there are a few undesirables among physicians, but her remarks seem to imply that a large portion, perhaps a majority of physicians push their agenda irrespective of patient needs or preferences in order to make money.
Most physicians I know and have worked with are very interested in the science of their profession and what holds up to scientific scrutiny. At the same time many will fight for patient’s rights. For example, they will treat JWs even though that patient population refuses what they sometimes feel is in their best interests. Few physicians, in my experience refuse to care for JWs, even when those same JW patients leave their office and “bad-mouth” them to others in the community.
Perhaps Dung works with scum-bags in her professional career. If so, I am sorry. It has been my privilege to know and work with many fine physicians and it is my impression that these are in the majority, though traditional WTS propaganda would have us believe otherwise.